Home » Blog » OSINT for Lawyers 2026 Part 3

OSINT, Online Investigations and Due Diligence. What Lawyers Need to Know in 2026 (Part 3)

Engaging a licensed private investigator is not simply about outsourcing a task. It is about transferring risk, ensuring accountability, and obtaining results that can withstand scrutiny.


In Australia, private investigation is a licensed activity regulated at the state and territory level. The requirements vary by jurisdiction, but the underlying principle is consistent: investigators must meet minimum standards of training, conduct, and accountability before they can lawfully operate.


Licensing requirements

In New South Wales, private investigators hold a Class 2E security licence issued by the Security Licensing & Enforcement Directorate (SLED). This licence replaced the former Commercial Agents and Private Inquiry Agents (CAPI) licence in 2022 and requires applicants to complete a Certificate III in Investigative Services, pass probity checks, and meet ongoing compliance obligations.


Victoria's Private Security Act 2004 — amended in 2024 — establishes similar requirements for investigators operating in that state. Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia each have their own licensing frameworks, though all require formal training and background checks.


The Certificate III in Investigative Services (CPP30619) is the national qualification. It covers legal and ethical obligations, evidence handling, interview techniques, surveillance methodology, and reporting standards. It is not a formality. It is a baseline that ensures investigators understand the boundaries within which they must operate.


Methodology and documentation

Licensed investigators operate within defined methodologies. They document what they search, when they search it, what they find, and how they verify it. This documentation is not bureaucratic overhead — it is the foundation of defensible results.


A properly prepared investigation report should detail the sources consulted, the date and time of each search, the results obtained, and the reasoning applied to interpret those results. It should distinguish between confirmed facts and inferences. It should acknowledge limitations.


This level of documentation serves multiple purposes. It supports evidentiary requirements if the matter proceeds to court. It provides a basis for substituted service applications if the subject cannot be located. It protects the instructing party by demonstrating that reasonable steps were taken.


Legal literacy

Licensed investigators understand the legal context in which they operate. They know the difference between lawful open-source research and unlawful intrusion. They understand when surveillance is permitted and when it is not. They know how to preserve evidence in a manner that meets court requirements.


This legal literacy extends to recognising when a matter falls outside their expertise or authority. A competent investigator will decline instructions that would require them to act unlawfully — and will explain why. This is a feature, not a limitation.


Proportionality

Investigation must be proportionate to the matter at hand. A comprehensive background check on a counterparty in a multi-million-dollar commercial dispute is appropriate. The same level of investigation for a minor contractual dispute may not be.


Licensed investigators are trained to assess proportionality and to advise clients when a proposed scope of work is excessive, unnecessary, or unlikely to yield useful results. This guidance can save clients money and avoid ethical complications.


Risk transfer and accountability

When you engage a licensed investigator, you transfer certain risks. If something goes wrong — if a boundary is crossed, if a complaint is made — the investigator bears primary responsibility. They hold professional indemnity insurance. They are subject to regulatory oversight. They can be held accountable through formal channels.


This does not absolve the instructing party of all responsibility. Lawyers must still ensure that the instructions they give are lawful and that the investigator they engage is appropriately qualified. But the risk profile is fundamentally different from relying on internal staff or unqualified contractors.


What to look for

When engaging an investigator, verify their licence is current and covers the work you need. Ask about their methodology and reporting standards. Clarify how they handle sensitive information and what safeguards they have in place.


A reputable investigator will be transparent about their capabilities and limitations. They will ask questions to understand the matter properly before accepting instructions. They will provide realistic timelines and cost estimates. And they will tell you if the work you are requesting falls outside what they can lawfully deliver.


In Part 4, we examine case studies that illustrate how investigative methodology — or its absence — shapes outcomes in legal and commercial contexts.